Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otmar Ebenhoech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Otmar Ebenhoech

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Otmar Ebenhoech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious G11 declined by DGG with the reasoning "would require afd", so here we are. Sources in the article are...youtube, the guy's homepage, and one single article on evworld.com. WP:BEFORE search produced nothing substantial either. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:13, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:13, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

• It's not obvious, because it might acually be notable and important. It needs a search by the community, not just 2 editors. DGG ( talk ) 04:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
  • I guess that's where we disagree - personally, I think anything so badly sourced that makes such outsize claims (and created by an SPA to boot) is a fairly clear G11. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
• Delete insufficient sourcing to demonstrate notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:05, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:09, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Not notable. The evworld article is returning a 404 error by the way (not that it would matter anyways because it still wouldn't meet notability). - Harsh 14:06, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. - Harsh 19:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.